EU-Australia Free Trade Agreement

Negotiations for an EU-Australia FTA began in July 2018, were delayed at the end of 2021 by diplomatic tensions over the Australian cancellation of the French submarine contract, but resumed in 2022  .

Australia was seeking greater market access for its agricultural goods and for manufacturing and services exports. The danger was that it could trade off other important policies in return for these. See AFTINET’s 2018 submission here.

The EU wanted protection for its Geographical Indications for agricultural products (that only EU products can be called Prosecco, Feta cheese etc). It has demanded this as a condition for reduced tariffs and quotas for Australian agricultural exports. Australian farmers and food industries said  no to this, but wanted more access to the EU for their exports. 

First climate complaint under EU trade deal enforcement over New Zealand's climate rollbacks

October 2, 2026: Both ENDS, a Dutch civil society organisation, has filed a formal complaint with the European Commission under the EU-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. Both sides made binding climate commitments in that agreement not to reduce climate regulation and to abide by commitments they made under the United Nations Paris agreement to address the climate crisis by reducing carbon emissions. The difference with previous non-binding commitments in some agreements is that the state-to-state dispute process which applies to tariff reductions and other issues in the agreement also applies to this commitment. New Zealand could ultimately face trade penalties if it is found to have breached the commitments and does not amend the policies.

Australia-EU FTA text only partly released: some positives but full analysis after full text released in September

April 10, 2026: After eight years, the negotiations for the Australia-EU Free Trade Agreement concluded on March 24. The text was not released, only government summaries of mostly good news stories about cheaper imports and more market access for Australian products to the EU. See our media release with preliminary comments here.

AFTINET submission to reviews of ISDS in agreements with Egypt and Eastern European countries

March 2, 2026: the AFTINET submission reviews the latest evidence against investor rights to sue governments, known as Investor-State Dispute Settlement  (ISDS).  The submission recommends that Bilateral Investment agreements  with Hungary, Poland, Czechia, Lithuania and Romania should be terminated without sunset clauses, which preserve existing investor rights to sue after agreements are terminated.

EU passes landmark enforceable corporate accountability law

September 3, 2024: In May 2024, the EU and its 27 member states passed a landmark law called the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) which came into force in July 2024. The law imposes binding obligations on corporate giants to check their global value chains for human rights and environmental risks and harms. It also enables victims and EU member states to hold noncompliant companies accountable to a supervisory authority that will be granted powers to impose penalties such as fines of 5% of a company’s global net turnover and publishing the names of sanctioned companies.

Collapse of the Australia-EU FTA negotiations should not open the door to deals without human rights and environmental commitments

29 November, 2023: Following the collapse of the Australia-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) last month, there is some media speculation that the Albanese government might attempt to bolster its free trade agenda by reviving  a trade deal with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), despite its poor human rights and labour rights record.

European Court says States should decide on ISDS

On 16 May 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the long-awaited landmark Opinion 2/15 on the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (FTA). According to the CJEU, the agreement falls under the EU’s powers, but not entirely. EU Member States’ national and regional parliaments and the European Parliament must ratify some important provisions regarding investors, particularly ISDS.

Subscribe to