International trade agreements bring new transnational food companies into countries, along with new food advertising and promotion. This has often led to an increase in unhealthy foods entering the domestic market. The TPPA could go even further and increase the influence of the food industry on domestic regulatory regimes and policies. See the link to the Conversation blog
Kelly Nicholls from Medecins Sans Frontieres writes in The Australian that US proposals in the Trans Pacific Partnership negotiations for restrictive intellectual property rights on medicines would make the TPPA the most damaging trade agreement ever for access to essential medicines in developing countries. http://www.msfaccess.org/content/trans-pacific-partnership-threat-afford...
Check out AFTINET’s new leaflet on the TPPA
AFTINET’s new leaflet shows how the corporate agenda in the TPPA would affect medicine prices, workers rights, the environment and internet freedom, and would give special rights to foreign investors to sue governments over health and environment regulation.
Also our new factsheets that show how the corporate agenda in the TPPA would affect the provision of services, women’s rights and worker's rights .
An article by Dr Deborah Gleeson of Latrobe University, published recently in the British Medical Journal, The Lancet, says the ability of governments world-wide to make sound public health policies and laws is increasingly threatened by trade and investment treaties.
Watch Dr Deborah Gleeson from Latrobe University talk about the threats to public health in the Trans Pacific Partnership Negotiations, including higher medicine prices and less regulation of health hazards like tobacco in this video of a recent 'webinar'.
ANU Professor Matthew Rimmer’s article in The Conversation explains how the US administration’s twin trade initiatives, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPPA) and the Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) could undermine labour rights, environmental protection, access to medicines and internet freedom.
Read article here.
Amy Corderoy’s article ‘Trading health for even fatter profits” in the Sydney Morning Herald analyses how trade agreements like Pacific Island PACER-plus and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPPA) can lead to increases in consumption of unhealthy food in developing countries, and prevent governments from introducing public health measures to inform consumers of the dangers.
A blog by AFTINET Convenor, Dr Patricia Ranald, on investor disputes and rural public health was published on the Crikey website on January 25, 2013, countering the views expressed by some cattle farmers’ organisations that want speedy access for their exports and are lobbying for the Australian government to agree to investor rights to sue governments (ISDS) in the Korean FTA. Dr Ranald explains why this would be a mistake.
Read on for the full article.