Stronger copyright monopolies
Parts of the RCEP’s intellectual property chapter could be modelled on the flawed TPP, which extended copyright provisions in favour of corporations at the expense of consumers. Many copyright experts are concerned that this could stifle creativity, free speech, and even economic growth.
Copyright law is meant to maintain a balance between the right of creators to a reasonable income through payments for the use of their work, and the rights of consumers to fair use of information.
Most copyright is now held by corporations, which lobby for trade agreements to extend their rights.
TPP-like provisions would lock in strong specific legal rights for copyright holders and criminalisation of copyright breaches, with much vaguer references to fair use provisions for consumers.
These detailed, specific rights for copyright holders could prevent governments from introducing reforms to improve consumer rights or to respond to technological change in the future.
A recent Productivity Commission Report (December 2016) found that copyright and patent rules agreed to in the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement are costing governments and consumers hundreds of millions of dollars a year. These are the same rules which would have been locked in by the TPP and which now may be pushed through in the RCEP.
- Law Professors Address RCEP Negotiators on Copyright, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Feb 24, 2017
- TPP locks in copyright & patent rules, making reform near impossible, AFTINET, April 2016
- Submission to the JSCOT inquiry into the TPP, Assoc. Prof. Kimberlee Weatherall, March 2016
For all the latest news on the RCEP, follow this link.
Updated: March 2017